Contents

Abstract 2

Introduction 2

Phylogenetic analysis 2

Results 3

Systematic Paleontology 4

CLASS TRILOBITA WALSH, 1771 4

Balnibarbi erugata Fortey, 1974 4

Balnibarbi erugata erugata Fortey, 1974 5

Balnibarbi erugata sombrero (Fortey, 1974) 5

Balnibarbi scimitar, Fortey, 1974 6

Cloacaspis Fortey, 1974 6

Cloacaspis ekphymosa Fortey, 1974 6

Cloacaspis ceryx (Fortey, 1974) 7

Cloacaspis ceryx ceryx (Fortey, 1974) 7

Cloacaspis ceryx anataphra (Fortey, 1974) 7

Cloacaspis tesselata Fortey and Droser, 1999 8

Acknowledgments 10

References 11

AMERICAN MUSEUM NOVITATES

Number 3928: 20 pp. May 7, 2019

Copyright © 7merican Museum of Natural History 2019

ISSN 0003-0082

Phylogenetic analysis and revision of the trilobite subfamily Balnibarbiinae (Olenidae)

Melanie J. Hopkins1

Abstract

The Balnibarbiinae is one of eight subfamilies of the Olenidae, a diverse family of late Cambrian to Ordovician trilobites. Balnibarbiine species occur in a relatively continuous section of deeper-water sediments exposed along the northeastern coastline of Spitsbergen, Svalbard, as well as scattered deeper-water beds in central Nevada. Results of phylogenetic analyses of the subfamily using both parsimony and Bayesian methods are consistent with a previous hypothesis based on phyletic similarity and stratigraphic range. Cloacaspis Fortey, 1974, is supported as monophyletic, but the support for Balnibarbi Fortey, 1974, is weak, and the genus may be paraphyletic to Cloacaspis even with the reassignment of Balnibarbi ceryx Fortey, 1974, to Cloacaspis. New field collections and discovery of previously undescribed material in museum and survey collections provides the basis for emended descriptions of the genus Cloacaspis, as well as Cloacaspis tesselata Fortey and Droser, 1999, Cloacaspis ekphymosa Fortey, 1974, and Balnibarbi erugata Fortey, 1974, and expands the geographic range of the subfamily to Alaska.

Introduction

The Olenidae is a diverse family of trilobites (408 species in 68 genera; Adrain, 2011) ranging from the Guzhangian to the end of the Ordovician (Adrain, 2013). The Balnibarbiinae is one of eight subfamilies within Olenidae, and is known almost exclusively from deeper-water deposits in Ny Friesland, northeastern Spitsbergen, Svalbard (Fortey, 1974; Kröger et al., 2017). The pre-Carboniferous basement of the Svalbard archipelago consists of several tectonostratigraphically distinct terranes that were stretched along the margin of Laurentia in pre-Caledonian times (Gee and Page, 1994; Gee and Teben’kov, 2004). Other balnibarbiine occurrences are in deeper-water deposits in Nevada and Alaska (Ethington et al., 1995; Fortey and Droser, 1999; this study). Balnibarbiine specimens are much rarer in western Laurentia, however, primarily because deeper-water sediments are rare in the Early to Middle Ordovician rock record preserved there. In contrast, the section at Ny Friesland is one of the most continuous deeper-water sections of Early to Middle Ordovician age anywhere in the world.

The subfamily Balnibarbiinae was first described based on collections made during two expeditions to Ny Friesland, Spitsbergen, in 1967 (Vallance and Fortey, 1968) and 1972 (Fortey and Bruton, 1973; see also Fortey and Bruton, 2013). The abundance of specimens in the Spitsbergen sections made it possible to infer changes in the exoskeletal morphology through stratigraphic time. Based on such observations, Fortey (1974) proposed a phylogeny consisting of three evolutionary lineages. In his conception, the genus Balnibarbi Fortey, 1974, comprised two basal evolutionary lineages and was paraphyletic to the third evolutionary lineage, consisting of species of the genus Cloacaspis Fortey, 1974. During this time, undescribed olenids were also reported from late Early to early Middle Ordovician deposits in Nevada (McKee et al., 1972), but it was not until the 1990s that these were recognized as having an affinity with Spitsbergen balnibarbiines (Ethington et al., 1995; Fortey and Droser, 1999).

Recently, the author collected new balnibarbiine specimens from both Nevada (2015) and Spitsbergen (2016). The purpose of this study is to use new collections and modern methods to revise the subfamily and test Fortey’s (1974) phylogenetic hypothesis.

Phylogenetic analysis

Materials and Methods

Character design and coding: Forty-five characters are included in the analysis, of which 32 describe the cranidium, four describe the librigenae, and nine describe the pygidium. Characters describing the thorax and hypostome are excluded because these sclerites are unknown for most taxa in the analysis. Characters were coded using reductive coding sensu Strong and Lipscomb (1999). All taxa (including outgroup species, see below) share the following traits: curved and divergent anterior facial suture, deflected S1, and occipital node, where known. These three traits vary in how commonly they occur among olenids (e.g., Monti and Confalonieri, 2019), but because they are constant among the taxa in this analysis, they are excluded from the character matrix. The absence or presence of triangular pleural nodes is also excluded because, while this trait is likely shared by all balnibarbiine species to the exclusion of other olenid species, its presence or absence cannot be coded for the outgroup taxa (for which pygidia are unknown). The data matrix is archived in MorphoBank (http://morphobank.org/permalink/?P3234).

Fortey and Droser (1999) did not describe the pygidium for Cloacaspis tesselata. Based on association of specimens, a pygidium found in the U.S. Geological Survey collections is tentatively assigned to this species (see Systematic Paleontology). The full character matrix includes character states coded from this specimen, but the analysis was also rerun, treating these states as missing.

Outgroup selection: Fortey (1974) noted that the glabellae of some Parabolinella Brögger, 1882, species resembled those of balnibarbiine species. Parabolinella prolata Robison and Pantoja-Alor, 1968, and Parabolinella tumifrons Kobayashi, 1936, were selected as outgroup taxa because they have Laurentian occurrences as well as occurrences during the early Skullrockian (i.e., they are older than the ingroup taxa). They are also placed basal to other Parabolinella species in recent phylogenetic analyses (Monti and Confalonieri, 2013, 2017). Fortey (1974) also suggested that Agalatus (= Inkouia, fide Zhang, 1985) was similar to Balnibarbi and Cloacaspis, but excluded the genus from the Balnibarbiinae because species lacked the diagnostic triangular pleural node. Although this overall similarity makes the genus a candidate outgroup, no Inkuoia species were included in the outgroup because it was not possible to code most of the characters from available figures showing specimens assigned to Inkouia species (e.g., Lisogor, 1961; Han, 1983).

Tree searching: Heuristic searching in PAUP*4.0b10 (Swofford, 1998) was used to find the optimal tree according to the maximum parsimony criterion. Inapplicable characters were treated as missing data. Taxa were added by random sequence addition with 100 replicates and branch swapping was performed using the tree bisection reconnection option (TBR). Five characters (1, 9, 14, 19, 33) describing continuous variation were treated as ordered. All characters were weighted equally. Clade support was assessed based on Bremer support values, and bootstrap and jackknife analyses (with 33% deletion of characters), each consisting of 1000 replicates.

For comparison, a Bayesian search was conducted in MrBayes 3.2.6 (Ronquist et al., 2012), employing the Mk model (Lewis, 2001), specifying that only variable characters were sampled, assuming no rate variation across characters, and assigning Parabolinella prolata as outgroup. Different analyses were run assuming no character rate variation, and both gamma- and log-normally (K = 4) distributed character rate variation (Harrison and Larsson, 2015); 500,000 MCMC repetitions were required for convergence for all analyses.

Results

The parsimony-based tree search recovered three most parsimonious trees with tree length of 98. All nodes are resolved in the strict consensus tree (fig. 1) except those leading to the clade comprising Cloacaspis tesselata, Clocacaspis senilis, and Cloacaspis ekphymosa. In the Bayesian analysis, a node uniting C. senilis and C. ekphymosa is recovered with a posterior probability of 55 regardless of settings for character rate variation (not shown). In both analyses, the two Cloacapsis ceryx subspecies are sister to one another, although this node is not as well supported in the parsimony tree as that uniting more-derived Cloacaspis species or the node uniting all Cloacaspis species, and is recovered in some maximum clade credibility trees but with posterior probability <50. Balnibarbi pulvurea and Balnibarbi tholia are recovered as sister taxa, and Balnibarbi erugata subspecies are supported as sister taxa in both analyses with moderate support. Balnibarbi is weakly supported as monophyletic in the parsimony tree and in the maximum clade credibility tree assuming no rate variation. If log-normal or gamma-shaped rate variation across characters is assumed instead of equal rates, maximum clade credibility trees indicate weak support for a paraphyletic Balnibarbi: the branch leading to B. tholia and B. pulvurea attaches below the node uniting Cloacaspis. For all Bayesian analyses, however, nodal support is low (posterior probabilities <50), so these relationships are effectively unresolved at this point. Although it is possible that Balnibarbi is actually paraphyletic to Cloacaspis, as conceived by Fortey (1974), all species except C. ceryx are retained within Balnibarbi. Coding pygidial characters as missing for Cloacaspis tesselata did not change the tree topologies or node support.

Figure 1. Results of phylogenetic analysis. A. Stratigraphic section of Olenidsletta Member, Profilstranda, Ny Friesland, Spitsbergen. Modified from Kröger et al., 2017. B. Strict consensus tree of three most parsimonious trees, scaled to time for graphical representation purposes using the all-branches additive-method (nodes scaled to first occurrence of oldest descendent and an arbitrary constant value is added to all branches in order to remove zero-length branches). Maximum clade credibility tree resulting from Bayesian analysis assuming no rate variation is the same as the strict consensus tree except that the node joining C. senilis and C. ekphymosa is also recovered with a posterior probability of 55. The only difference in the topology of the maximum clade credibility tree if rates are assumed to be gamma- or log-normally distributed is that the branch leading to B. tholia and B. pulvurea attaches below the node uniting Cloacaspis, which is also more strongly supported (posterior probability = 70); 50% majority-rule consensus trees are unable to resolve Balnibarbi as a monophyletic clade (all nodes with posterior probabilities <50 collapse). Values to left of nodes show Bremer support values/bootstrap frequencies/jackknife frequencies. Italicized values to right of nodes show posterior probabilities for analyses assuming no rate variation/gamma-distributed rate variation/log-normally distributed rate variation; NA indicates that the node shown was not supported in the maximum clade credibility tree for that analysis. Stratigraphic ranges based on Fortey (1980), Fortey and Droser (1999), and new collections that extend the range of Cloacaspis ceryx anataphra and Balnibarbi scimitar. Cloacaspis tesselata is Rangerian and likely just younger than C. senilis.

Systematic Paleontology

Specimens were examined from collections in the Natural History Museum, Oslo (PMO-NF), Sedgwick Museum, University of Cambridge (CAMSM), Cambridge Arctic Shelf Programme (CASP), the U.S. Geological Survey (USGS), the Smithsonian (USNM), and the American Museum of Natural History (AMNH). Because there were differences in section measurements taken between Spitsbergen expeditions (compare Fortey, 1980, with Kröger et al., 2017), stratigraphic ranges in figure 1 are shown scaled to the 2016 sections and include range extensions based on new collections (see below).

CLASS TRILOBITA WALSH, 1771

ORDER OLENIDA ADRAIN, 2011

FAMILY OLENIDAE BURMEISTER, 1843

SUBFAMILY BALNIBARBIINAE FORTEY, 1974

Balnibarbi Fortey, 1974

Type species: Balnibarbi pulvurea Fortey, 1974.

Diagnosis: As in Fortey, 1974: 21.

Included species: Balnibarbi pulvurea Fortey, 1974; Balnibarbi erugata erugata Fortey, 1974; Balnibarbi erugata sombrero (Fortey, 1974); Balnibarbi scimitar Fortey, 1974; Balnibarbi tholia Fortey, 1974.

Balnibarbi erugata Fortey, 1974

Figure 2

Type subspecies: Balnibarbi erugata erugata Fortey, 1974.

Type locality: Profilstranda, Olenidsletta Member, Valhallfonna Formation, Ny Friesland, Spitsbergen, Svalbard.

Subspecies: Balnibarbi erugata erugata Fortey, 1974, Balnibarbi erugata sombrero (Fortey, 1974).

Emended diagnosis: Balnibarbi species with long (sag.) anterior border rounded on midline. Anterior border with 25–30 pits; pits expressed only on internal mold. Glabella rounded anteriorly; preglabellar field broad. Palpebral lobes long, with anterior end forward of 2p and posterior end at occipital furrow. Moderately large pygidium with four axial rings.

Discussion: In both subspecies, distinct pits are visible only on the internal mold of the anterior border furrow (fig. 2E, F). In this case (where the pit is not expressed on the dorsal surface), this trait may be better described as a series of “protuberances” on the ventral surface that form pits on the internal mold. These protuberances meet nodes on the doublure of the librigena beneath the anterior border of the cranidium (see Fortey, 1974: pl. 5, fig. 10). On other Balnibarbi species, the structures are visible on the anterior border (e.g., Balnibarbi pulvurea, see Fortey, 1974: pl. 1, fig. 4), and more in keeping with the idea of a “pit.”

The holotype of Balnibarbi erugata erugata is almost completely exfoliated (fig. 2A), but specimens that otherwise fit the diagnosis (including some listed by Fortey, 1974) show very fine granulation across the glabella (fig. 2D), in the posterior border furrow (fig. 2C), and more rarely preserved on the frontal area (fig. 2B). Terrace lines are evident on the border of the holotype (fig. 2A) and some better-preserved specimens (fig. 2B). Fortey (1974) differentiated Balnibarbi erugata and Balnibarbi sombrero based on the length (sag.) of the preglabellar field relative to the glabella. The type and figured specimens of B. sombrero do have a larger preglabellar field (fig. 3), and there is no granulation visible on the external surface where preserved. However, some specimens that have fine granulation also have large preglabellar fields (e.g., PMO-NF-227.730). In addition, fine granulation is easily eroded away on exposed surfaces (see fig. 4F). No new specimens of Balnibarbi erugata sombrero were recovered during the 2016 expedition to Spitsbergen, nor were any Balnibarbi erugata erugata specimens collected from trilobite zone V1b, thus the known stratigraphic ranges are still nonoverlapping. This separation in stratigraphic time may have contributed to Fortey’s decision to rank each at the species level. However, the two subspecies differ morphologically in the same way that subspecies of Cloacaspis ceryx do (expression of granulation and morphometric differences in the frontal area). Thus, B. sombrero was lowered to subspecies status; the name erugata takes precedence following ICZN Article 24.2.

Figure 2. Balnibarbi erugata Fortey, 1974, close-ups. A. Balnibarbi erugata erugata, holotype cranidium, PMO-NF-3016. Note exfoliation of frontal area and glabella. Arrow points to terrace lines on anterior border that are expressed on both the external surface and internal mold. B. Anterior border of Balnibarbi erugata erugata, CAMSM F3976, showing faint caeca and very fine granulation on frontal area near anterior border furrow and terrace lines on border. C. Posterior border furrow on Balnibarbi erugata erugata, CAMSM F3976, showing very fine granulation. D. Occipital ring of Balnibarbi erugata erugata, PMO-NF-695, showing very fine granulation on glabella. E. Balnibarbi erugata erugata PMO-NF-772. Arrows point to select pits in anterior border furrow; specimen is exfoliated. F. Balnibarbi erugata sombrero, PMO-NF-2054. Arrows point to select pits in anterior border furrow on exfoliated surface. Scale bars = 1 mm.

Balnibarbi erugata erugata Fortey, 1974

Figure 2A–D, E

Balnibarbi erugata Fortey, 1974: 31, pl. 5, fig. 1-10.

Holotype: Cranidium, PMO NF 3016 (figured in Fortey, 1974: pl. 5, fig. 1-3).

Type locality: Profilstranda, Olenidsletta Member, Valhallfonna Formation, Ny Friesland, Spitsbergen, Svalbard.

Stratigraphic range: Throughout trilobite zone V1c and the very beginning of V2a (Fortey, 1980). These zones coincide with the upper Oepikodus evae and lower Oepikodus intermedius conodont zones, and the Didymographtus protobifidus graptolite zone within the upper Floian (fig. 1; see also Kröger et al., 2017).

Diagnosis: Balnibarbi erugata subspecies with relatively short (sag.) preglabellar field (<0.35 length of glabella) and fine granulation present on glabella, axial, palpebral, and posterior border furrows, and on frontal area adjacent to anterior border furrow.

Balnibarbi erugata sombrero (Fortey, 1974)

Figure 2F

Balnibarbi sombrero Fortey, 1974: 32, pl. 6, fig. 1-4.

Holotype: Cranidium, PMO NF 835 (figured in Fortey, 1974: pl. 6, fig. 1-2).

Type locality: Profilstranda, Olenidsletta Member, Valhallfonna Formation, Ny Friesland, Spitsbergen, Svalbard.

Stratigraphic range: Middle of trilobite zone V1b (Fortey, 1980). This zone coincides with the lower Oepikodus evae conodont zone and Pendeograptus fruticosus graptolite zone within the upper Floian (fig. 1; see also Kröger et al., 2017).

Diagnosis: Balnibarbi erugata species with relatively long (sag.) preglabellar field (>0.35 length of glabella) and smooth exoskeletal surface. Known only from cranidia.

Balnibarbi scimitar, Fortey, 1974

Balnibarbi scimitar Fortey, 1974: 33, pl. 7, fig. 1-10.

Holotype: Cranidium, PMO NF 2785 (figured in Fortey, 1974: pl. 7, figs. 1, 3, 8).

Type locality: Melt stream D on Olenidsletta, Olenidsletta Member, Valhallfonna Formation, Ny Friesland, Spitsbergen, Svalbard.

Stratigraphic range: The type material for this species was sampled from a single bed estimated to be no more than 6 m from the base of the Olenidsletta member (Fortey, 1974), which would put the occurrence in trilobite zone V1a (Fortey, 1980; coincident with conodont zone Oepikodus communis; see Kröger et al., 2017). New specimens were recovered in 2016 from the Profilstranda section from a bed 30 m above the base of the Olenidsletta member which extends the stratigraphic range into trilobite zone V1b (fig. 1).

Diagnosis: As in Fortey, 1974: 33.

Cloacaspis Fortey, 1974

Type species: Cloacaspis senilis Fortey, 1974.

Emended Diagnosis: Balnibarbiine trilobites with facial sutures moderately divergent in front of eyes. Pits present on internal mold of anterior border furrow, and may also expressed on the dorsal surface. Frontal area relatively short (sag.), ranging from 10%–20% of the total cranidial sagittal length. Glabella with four pairs of glabellar furrows of balnibarbiinae type: 1P extends posterolaterally from axial furrow before turning abruptly posteriorly; 2P straight, extending posterolaterally from axial furrow, or curving slightly posteriorly; 3P straight, short, transverse, not reaching axial furrow; 4P straight, short, slightly oblique, not reaching axial furrow. 3P and 4P tend to be longer than in other balnibarbiine genera (Balnibarbi species), and 4P is more weakly expressed than other furrows. Postocular fixed cheeks triangular. Posterior border of free cheek curves forward to long genal spine. Pygidium small, with two to three axial rings. Posterior border of pygidium may bear short spines.

Included species: Cloacaspis senilis Fortey, 1974; Cloacaspis ceryx (Fortey, 1974); Cloacaspis dejecta Fortey, 1974; Cloacaspis ekphymosa Fortey, 1974; Cloacaspis tesselata Fortey and Droser, 1999.

Figure 3. Size of preglabellar field relative to glabella in subspecies of Balnibarbi erugata and Cloacaspis ceryx. Arrow points to PMO-NF-227.730. Differences in relative length of preglabellar field are not correlated with overall size of the cranidium, and are thus not due to allometry. However, while subspecies of Balnibarbi erugata overlap in cranidial length, all measured specimens of C. ceryx anataphra are smaller than those of C. ceryx ceryx. Since these subspecies also differ in expression of surface granulation, it is possible that expression of granulation is related to size.

Cloacaspis ekphymosa Fortey, 1974

Figure 4A

Triarthrus sp. Ross, 1965: 18, pl. 8, fig. 4.

Cloacaspis ekphymosa Fortey, 1974: 41, pl. 11, figs. 12, 14–18.

Holotype: Cranidium, SMA 84075 (figured in Fortey, 1974: pl. 11, fig. 12).

Type locality: Profilstranda, Olenidsletta Member, Valhallfonna Formation, Ny Friesland, Spitsbergen, Svalbard.

Other geographic occurrences: Lost River Area, Seward Peninsula, Alaska (see Ross, 1965).

Stratigraphic range: Fortey (1974, 1980) recovered this species from 105 m to 120 m in the section of Fortey (1980), stratigraphically below the congeneric Cloacaspis senilis, which was recovered from 120 m to 145 m above the base of the Olenidsletta Member. This species was recovered in 2016 cooccurring with Cloacaspis senilis at 139 m above the base of the Olenidsletta Member at the Profilstranda section (Kröger et al., 2017; see also fig. 1), which is estimated to be at about 119 m within the stratigraphic section of Fortey (1980). It is thus not clear whether this should be considered an extension of the stratigraphic range of Cloacaspis senilis or of Cloacaspis ekphymosa, but does indicate that the species overlapped just after the first appearance of the former and just before the last appearance of the latter.

Diagnosis: As in Fortey, 1974: 41–42.

Discussion: Fortey (1974: 14) suggested that the “Triarthrus” cranidium figured by Ross (1965: pl. 8, fig. 4) was more likely Cloacaspis. Examination of this specimen confirms this, and the presence of the postpalpebral furrow indicates that the specimen belongs to Cloacaspis ekphymosa Fortey, 1974, although the extensive exfoliation does not allow for the confirmation of granulate surface sculpture (fig. 4A). This identification extends the geographic range of this species and genus to Alaska.

Cloacaspis ceryx (Fortey, 1974)

Figure 4B–F

Balnibarbi ceryx Fortey, 1974: 29.

Holotype: Cranidium, SMA 84034 (figured in Fortey, 1974: pl. 8, fig. 1).

Type locality: Profilstranda, Olenidsletta Member, Valhallfonna Formation, Ny Friesland, Spitsbergen, Svalbard.

Emended Diagnosis: Cloacaspis species with greater (sag., exsag.) preglabellar length than other species of the genus; anterior border comes to a point on midline. Moderately sized pygidium with three axial rings.

Discussion: Fortey (1974) distinguished Cloacaspis ceryx ceryx and Cloacaspis ceryx anataphra by the latter having a shorter (sag.) preglabellar field relative to the glabella, no visible pits in the anterior border furrow, and a smooth exoskeletal surface. Examination of new and old specimens suggests that the mean preglabellar/glabella ratio is on average shorter in C. ceryx anataphra, but there is overlap in variation in this variable. In addition, while pits are not visible in the anterior border furrow, they are present and visible on the internal mold (fig. 4B, C). On the few specimens where it was possible to estimate the number of anterior pits, the number is slightly smaller (25–30) compared to C. ceryx ceryx (>30). Although granulation is very fine on C. ceryx ceryx and its preservation is very sensitive to any erosion of the surface (fig. 4D–F), it does appear that some specimens truly lack surface granulation. Based on this evidence, the two taxa are retained as subspecies, but the species complex is reassigned to the genus Cloacaspis based on the results of the phylogenetic analysis. The species complex is united with other Cloacaspis species by having advanced genal spines (char. 34), relatively large palpebral lobes (char. 19), and forward curvature of the palpebral lobe (char. 20). However, Cloacaspis ceryx shares some characters with some Balnibarbi species, including greater divergence of the anterior dorsal suture (char. 9), relatively wide palpebral lobes (char. 21), relatively short 3P (char. 25) larger number of axial rings (char. 37), and medial indent on posterior margin of pygidium (char. 44). The latter three characters are also shared with Cloacaspis dejecta.

Cloacaspis ceryx ceryx (Fortey, 1974)

Figure 4D–F

Balnibarbi ceryx ceryx Fortey, 1974: 28, pl. 8, fig. 1-6, pl. 9, figs. 1, 3, 4.

Holotype: Cranidium, SMA 84034 (figured in Fortey, 1974: pl. 8, fig. 1).

Type locality: Profilstranda, Olenidsletta Member, Valhallfonna Formation, Ny Friesland, Spitsbergen, Svalbard.

Stratigraphic range: Lower V1b trilobite zone (Fortey, 1980), which coincides with the lower Oepikodus evae conodont zone and Pendograptus fruticosus zone within the upper Floian (fig. 1; see also Kröger et al., 2017).

Diagnosis: Cloacaspis ceryx species with relatively long (sag.) preglabellar field (0.08 – 0.19 length of glabella) and finely granular exoskeletal surface.

Cloacaspis ceryx anataphra (Fortey, 1974)

Figure 4B, C

Balnibarbi ceryx anataphra Fortey, 1974: 30, pl. 9, fig. 5-7.

Holotype: Cranidium, PMO NF 651 (figured in Fortey, 1974: pl. 9, fig. 5).

Type locality: Profilstranda, Olenidsletta Member, Valhallfonna Formation, Ny Friesland, Spitsbergen, Svalbard.

Stratigraphic range: Fortey (1974) reported this subspecies from a single horizon about 8 m above the base of the Olenidsletta Member, which is estimated to be around 12.5 m in the 2016 stratigraphic section. Additional specimens were recovered in 2016 from 17–19 m in section, which extends the stratigraphic range of this subspecies, but the total range remains within the early half of the stratigraphic range of the other subspecies, Cloacaspis ceryx ceryx (fig. 1).

Diagnosis: Cloacaspis ceryx species with relatively narrow preglabellar field (0.06–0.10 length of glabella) and smooth exoskeletal surface.

Figure 4. Cloacaspis spp. A. Cloacaspis ekphymosa Fortey, 1974, USNM 144232. Collected from the Lost River Area on Seward Peninsula, Alaska, and previously identified as Triarthrus sp. (Ross, 1965). Arrow pointing to postpalpebral furrow. B. Anterior border of Cloacaspis ceryx anataphra (Fortey, 1974), AMNH-FI-101655. Black arrows pointing to faint anterior border pits on internal mold. C. Cloacaspis ceryx anataphra (Fortey, 1974), AMNH-FI-101655. Collected from PO-18 of the Olenidsletta Member of the Valhallfonna Formation (Kröger et al., 2017). D) Cloacaspis ceryx ceryx (Fortey, 1974), AMNH-FI-101657. Close-up of E, anterior glabellar lobe and F, posterior wing, showing presence of fine granulation of recently prepared surface (white arrow) and lack of granulation on exposed and slightly eroded surface (black arrow). Collected from bed PO-18 of the Olenidsletta Member of the Valhallfonna Formation (Kröger et al., 2017). Scale bars = 1 mm except A and D, where scale bar = 5 mm.

Cloacaspis tesselata Fortey and Droser, 1999

Figures 5–7

Clocaspis tesselata Fortey and Droser, 1999: 187, fig. 3.1–3.5.

Holotype: Cranidium, USNM 495868 (figured in Fortey and Droser, 1999: fig. 3.4).

Type locality: “Olenid bed,” Antelope Valley Formation, Little Rawhide Mountain, Hot Creek Range, Nye County, Nevada.

Other Occurrences: Antelope Valley Limestone, June Canyon Sequence, Ike’s Canyon, Nevada.

Stratigraphic range: Lower Dapingian. See discussion for more detail.

Diagnosis: As in Fortey and Droser, 1999: 187.

Emended Description: Posterior area of fixigenae broadly triangular in shape, steeply downsloping. The posterior border is elevated to form an articulating socket close to the occipital ring, as was described for Cloacaspis ceryx ceryx (Fortey, 1974) and is apparent in other Cloacaspis species (Fortey, 1974). Fine anastomizing lines distributed across entire glabella, not just frontal glabellar lobe; fine anastomizing lines on genal field bordering posterior dorsal suture (fig. 5D, E). Very fine granulation apparent on glabella (fig. 5F). Occipital lobe has very small medial tubercle. Librigenae fused at midline, with advanced genal spine, such that posterior border curves toward it. Triangular projection of anterior border at midline. Raised ridge follows outline of eye, more prominent anteriorly (fig. 5A, C, E). Tentatively assigned pygidium 1.6 times as wide as long, with two axial rings and rounded terminal piece. Anterolateral margin curves posteriorly from axis, posterior border smoothly curving. Pleural field slopping ventrally, with two strongly expressed pleural furrows, two moderately strongly expressed interpleural furrows, and weakly visible triangular pleural nodes. No border furrow. Surface sculpture unknown (fig. 7E, F).

Discussion: Cloacaspis tesselata was first described from the Antelope Valley Limestone exposed at Little Rawhide Mountain, Nevada. Specimens are rare at this locality, having been sparsely collected from a single 30 cm black limestone bed by Fortey and Droser in the mid- to late-1990s, and by the author in 2015. A similar olenid had been reported from the Antelope Valley Limestone in Ike’s Canyon in the Toquima Range, Nye County, Nevada (McKee et al., 1972; McKee, 1976; Ethington et al., 1995). The author found one scrappy olenid specimen (AMNH-FI-101458, not figured) over four days of fieldwork in Ike’s Canyon in 2015; however, additional specimens were found in the Columbia University collections now housed at the American Museum of Natural History (AMNH-FI-115824-825) and in the U.S. Geological Survey collections (USGS D2217-CO, D2219-CO, D2220-CO, D2280-CO, D2282-CO). Where the glabellar furrows are adequately preserved, all cranidia have the distinctive bifurcating glabellar furrows diagnostic of Cloacaspis tesselata; thus, it seems likely that other Cloacaspis-like sclerites found in these collections also belong to Cloacaspis tesselata. Specimens include complete fused librigena and a single pygidium (figs. 5, 6, 7), thereby making it possible to expand on the description.

None of the paratype cranidia of Cloacaspis tesselata (USNM 495686–88) have the posterior area of the fixigenae preserved. However, two new specimens, one collected from Little Rawhide Mountain (fig. 5B) and one found in the USGS collections, show the entire dorsal suture including the posterior area of the fixigenae (fig. 6A-B). Comparisons of these cranidia with new librigenal specimens (figs. 5A, C, 7A, B, D) show that there is an advanced genal spine, in contrast to Fortey and Droser’s (1999) description. It is also possible to see the distal end of the posterior border furrow start to gently curve up on the posterior wing of the cranidium (fig. 5A, C). The librigena assigned by Fortey and Droser (1999) appears to belong to Cloacaspis tesselata as well, but the posterior margin is not preserved well enough to see the genal angle (fig. 5D). Other librigenae from the USGS collections (fig. 7A–C) also show advanced genal spines (fig. 7D). Of the specimens examined, the acuteness of the angle in the Ike’s Canyon specimens is greater than that of the specimens recovered from Little Rawhide Mountain (compare fig. 5A with fig. 7A, B, and D), but it is possible that some of this variation is taphonomic, as the specimens from Ike’s Canyon are flattened relative to the specimens from Little Rawhide Mountain. Some librigenae recovered from Ike’s Canyon are fused (fig. 7A, B), as seen in other Cloacaspis species (and other olenid trilobites), but there is also a triangular projection at the anterior midline of the fused librigenae (fig. 7C) that has not been reported before. Fortey and Droser (1999) did not identify any pygidia, and only one specimen was found among the USGS or AMNH collections (fig. 7E) that could belong to Cloacaspis tesselata based on similarities to those described for Cloacaspis dejecta (Fortey, 1974: pl. 12, figs. 1, 4). The specimen is almost entirely exfoliated, so any surface sculpture remains unknown, though it is possible that there is fine granulation on the bit of exoskeleton on the right pleural region. One partially complete olenid specimen was found in USGS collection D2282-CO. Triangular pleural nodes are preserved on the thorax, indicating that it belongs to Balnibarbiinae. The glabellar furrows are poorly preserved, but the shape of the cranidium is consistent with Cloacaspis species, including Cloacaspis tesselata. The specimen shows a minimum of 11 thoracic segments (fig. 6E).

At Little Rawhide Mountain, the “olenid” bed is at the base of the North American Whiterockian Stage, which puts it around the Floian-Dapingian boundary at the base of the Middle Ordovician. The occurrences at Ike’s Canyon are not as well constrained. USGS collections D2217-CO and D2219-CO were sampled from the Orthidiella zone (McKee et al., 1972), however, which is correlative with Zone L of Ross (1951), the Psephosthenaspis Zone of Fortey and Droser (1996; see also Adrain et al., 2012, for trilobite zonation) and the Rangerian zone as defined by Ross et al. (1997). This places the Ike’s Canyon occurrences within the Dapingian.

Figure 5. Cloacaspis tesselata Fortey and Droser, 1999, specimens from Little Rawhide Mountain, Nevada. A. Librigena, AMNH-FI-115819. Specimen oriented relative to cranidium shown in B. B. Cranidium, AMNH-FI-115818. C. Librigena, AMNH-FI-115820. D. Paratype librigena, USNM 495690. Close-ups of B: E, posterior wing showing anastomizing lines along dorsal suture and glabella (white arrows) and curvature of distal part of posterior furrow (black arrow); and F, glabellar lobe L1, showing anastomizing lines and very fine granulation. G. Cranidium, AMNH-FI-115807. H. Cranidium, AMNH-FI-115808. All specimens except paratype collected by author in 2015. Scale bar = 1 mm.

Figure 6. Cloacaspis tesselata Fortey and Droser, 1999, specimens from Ike’s Canyon, Nevada. A. External mold of cranidium, USNM 720100. From USGS-D2219. B. Latex mold of cranidium, AMNH-FI-115823, cast from USNM 720100 (see A). C. Cranidium, AMNH-FI-115825. Found in Columbia University collections. D. Cranidium, AMNH-FI-115824. Found in Columbia University collections. E. Cranidium and thorax, USNM 720101. From USGS D2282-CO. Scale bar = 1 mm.

Figure 7. Cloacaspis tesselata? Fortey and Droser, 1999, specimens from Ike’s Canyon, Nevada. A. Dorsal view of fused librigena, USNM 720102 (part). From USGS-D2217. B. Ventral view of fused librigena, USNM 720102 (counterpart). C. Close-up of anterior part of librigena USNM 720102 (counterpart), showing fusion and triangular projection. D. Close-up of advanced genal spine on librigena USNM 720102 (part). E. Pygidium, USNM 720103. From USGS D2217. F. Lateral view of pygidium, USNM 720103. Scale bar = 1 mm, except for A and B, where scale bar = 5 mm.

Acknowledgments

The author offers thanks to Mariah Slovacek (AMNH) for fossil preparation, and to Susan Klofak (AMNH) and Jacob Spicer for field assistance at Ike’s Canyon and Little Rawhide Mountain in 2015. Fieldwork in Nevada was done under paleontological resource permits no. 0596-0082 (Forest Service) and N-93449 (Bureau of Land Management). Further thanks to George Langstaff (Forest Service) and John Kinsner (BLM) for facilitating permits, and to Kevin (Casey) McKinney (USGS), Matt Riley (Sedgwick Museum of Earth Sciences, Cambridge), Simon Kelly (Cambridge Arctic Shelf Programme), Franz-Josef Lindemann (Natural History Museum Oslo), and Jennifer Strotman (Smithsonian) for facilitating institutional visits and/or loans of specimens. Thank you to Richard Fortey and Lisa Amati for helpful reviews. New Spitsbergen material collected in 2016 was made possible through funding from the Niarchos Foundation and with the help of many people, particularly Björn Kröger (Finnish Museum of Natural History), Seth Finnegan (University of California at Berkeley), Franziska Franeck (NHM Oslo), and Håvard Kårsted (Longyearbyen); see also acknowledgements in Kröger et al., 2017. Fieldwork in Spitsbergen was done under permit 2016/00110-2; this work is part of Research in Svalbard (RIS) ID 10467.

References

Adrain, J.M. 2011. Class Trilobita Walch, 1771. In Z.-Q. Zhang (editor), Animal biodiversity: an outline of higher-level classification and survey of taxonomic richness. Zootaxa 3148: 104–109.

Adrain, J.M. 2013. A synopsis of Ordovician trilobite distribution and diversity. Memoir, Geological Society of London 38 (1): 297–336.

Adrain, J.M., N.E.B. McAdams, and T.S. Karim. 2012. The Middle Ordovician bathyurid trilobite Pseudoolenoides, with a revised trilobite biostratigraphy of the Dapingian and lower Darriwilian of western Laurentia. Zootaxa 3467: 1–97.

Brögger, W.C. 1882. Die silurischen Etagen 2 und 3 im Kristianiagebiet und auf Eker, ihre Gliederung, Fossilien, Schichtenstörgen und Contactmetamorphosen. Kristiania [Oslo], Norway: A.W. Brögger,.

Burmeister, H. 1843. Die Organisation der Trilobiten aus ihren lebenden Verwandten entwickelt; nebst einer systematischen Uebersicht aller zeither beschriebenen Arten. Berlin: Reimer.

Ethington, R.L., S.C. Finney, J.F. Miller, R.J. Ross, Jr., and C. Valdes-Camin. 1995. Pre-meeting trip—central Great Basin transect. In J.D. Cooper (editor), Ordovician of the Great Basin: fieldtrip guidebook and volume for the seventh international symposium on the Ordovician System, Las Vegas, NV, USA, June 1995: 1–50. Pacific Section, Society for Sedimentary Geology, Fullerton, CA.

Fortey, R.A. 1974. The Ordovician trilobites of Spitsbergen. I. Olenidae. Norsk Polarinstitutt Skrifter 160: 1–129.

Fortey, R.A. 1980. The Ordovician trilobites of Spitsbergen. III. Remaining trilobites of the Valhallfonna Formation. Norsk Polarinstitutt Skrifter 171: 163.

Fortey, R.A., and D.L. Bruton. 1973. Cambrian-Ordovician rocks adjacent to Hinlopenstretet, North Ny Friesland, Spitsbergen. Geological Society of America Bulletin 84: 2227–2242.

Fortey, R.A., and D.L. Bruton. 2013. Lower Ordovician trilobites of the Kirtonryggen Formation, Spitsbergen. Fossils and Strata 59: 1–116.

Fortey, R.A., and M.L. Droser. 1996. Trilobites at the base of the Middle Ordovician, western United States. Journal of Paleontology 70 (1): 73–99.

Fortey, R.A., and M.L. Droser. 1999. Trilobites from the base of the type Whiterockian (Middle Ordovician) in Nevada. Journal of Paleontology 73 (2): 182–201.

Gee, D.G., and L.M. Page. 1994. Caledoinian terrane assembly on Svalbard: new evidence from 40Ar/39Ar dating in Ny Friesland. American Journal of Science 294: 1166–1186.

Gee, D.G., and A.M. Teben’kov. 2004. Svalbard: a fragment of the Laurentian margin. Geological Society, London, Memoirs 30 (1): 191–206.

Han, N.-R. 1983. Lower Ordovician trilobites from the Yinchufu Formation of Jiangshan, W. Zhejiang. Acta Palaeontologica Sinica 1983-05: 571–576.

Harrison, L.B., and H.C.E. Larsson. 2015. Among-character rate variation distributions in phylogenetic analysis of discrete morphological characters. Systematic Biology 64 (2): 307–324.

Kobayashi, T. 1936. On the Parabolinella fauna from Province Jujuy, Argentina, with a note on the Olenidae. Japanese Journal of Geology and Geography 13 (1-2): 85–102.

Kröger, B., S. Finnegan, F. Franeck, and M.J. Hopkins. 2017. The Ordovician succession adjacent to Hinlopenstretet, Ny Friesland, Spitsbergen. American Museum Novitates 3882: 1–28.

Lewis, P.O. 2001. A likelihood approach to estimating phylogeny from discrete morphological character data. Systematic Biology 50 (6): 913–925.

Lisogor, K.A. 1961. [Trilobites of the Tremadoc and adjacent strata of Kendyktas]. Trudy Geologicheskogo Instituta. Akademiya Nauk SSSR 18: 55–92. [in Russian]

McKee, E.H. 1976. Geology of the northern part of the Toquima Range, Lander, Eureka, and Nye Counties, Nevada. U.S. Geological Survey Professional Paper 931.

McKee, E.H., B.S. Norford, and R.J. Ross Jr. 1972. Correlation of the Ordovician shelly facies Orthidiella zone with zones of the graptolitic facies, Toquima Range, Nevada, and North White River region, British Columbia. U.S. Geological Survey Professional Paper 800-C: C145–C156.

Monti, D.S., and V.A. Confalonieri. 2013. Phylogenetic analysis of the late Cambrian–early Ordovician genus Parabolinella Brögger (Trilobita, Olenidae). Geological Journal 48 (2-3): 156–169.

Monti, D.S., and V.A. Confalonieri. 2017. Comparing phylogenetics and linear morphometrics to solve the generic assignment of Parabolinella? triarthroides Harrington (Trilobita, Olenidae). Journal of Paleontology 91 (5): 919–932.

Monti, D.S., and V.A. Confalonieri. 2019. First cladistic analysis of the trilobite family Olenidae from the Furongian and Ordovician. Lethaia. [doi: 10.1111/let.12313]

Robison, R.A., and J. Pantoja-Alor. 1968. Tremadocian trilobites from the Nochixtlan Region, Oaxaca, Mexico. Journal of Paleontology 42 (3): 767–800.

Ronquist, F., et al. 2012. MrBayes 3.2: Efficient Bayesian phylogenetic inference and model choice across a large model space. Systematic Biology 61 (3): 539–542.

Ross, R.J., Jr. 1951. Stratigraphy of the Garden City Formation in northeastern Utah, and its trilobite faunas. Peabody Museum of Natural History, Yale University, Bulletin 6: 161.

Ross, R.J., Jr. 1965. Early Ordovician trilobites from the Seward Peninsula, Alaska. Journal of Paleontology 39 (1): 17–20.

Ross, R.J., Jr., et al. 1997. The Ibexian, lowermost series in the north American Ordovician. In M.E. Taylor (editor), Early Paleozoic biochronology of the Great Basin, western United States. US Geological Survey Professional Paper 1579: 1–50.

Strong, E.E., and D. Lipscomb. 1999. Character coding and inapplicable data. Cladistics 15: 363–371.

Swofford, D.L. 1998. PAUP*: Phylogenetic analysis using parsimony* 4.0. Sunderland, MA: Sinauer.

Vallance, G., and R.A. Fortey. 1968. Ordovician succession in north Spitsbergen. Proceedings of the Geological Society of London 1648: 91–97.

Zhang, W. 1985. Synonyms of Ordovician and Cambrian trilobites. Palaeontologia Cathayana 2: 177–178.

1 Division of Paleontology, American Museum of Natural History