Contents

ABSTRACT 2

INTRODUCTION 2

MATERIALS AND METHODS 2

SYSTEMATICS 5

Other Taxa 7

Family Xerobdellidae Moore, 1946 7

Order Rhynchobdellida Blanchard, 1894 7

Helobdella octatestisaca Lai and Chang, 2009 8

Helobdella socimulcensis Caballero, 1931 8

Placobdella ringueleti López-Jiménez and Oceguera-Figueroa, 2009 8

CONCLUSIONS 8

ACKNOWLEDGMENTS 10

REFERENCES 10

AMERICAN MUSEUM NOVITATES

Number 3895: 15 pp. March 12, 2018

Copyright © American Museum of Natural History 2018

ISSN 0003-0082

Leeches from Chiapas, Mexico, with a new species of Erpobdella (Hirudinida: Erpobdellidae)

MICHAEL TESSLER,1 MARK E. SIDDALL,2 AND ALEJANDRO OCEGUERA-FIGUEROA3

ABSTRACT

Freshwater leeches were collected from Chiapas, Mexico. Among these collections and prior records, a total of nine species were found, comprising six genera and four families. One species, Diestecostoma octannulata, represents a new record for Mexico and two species, Helobdella elongata and H. octatestisaca, represent new records for Chiapas. Additionally, a new species of Erpobdella was discovered from a single stream in the park El Arcotete near San Cristobal de las Casas. Here it is described as Erpobdella adani and it is morphologically distinguished from Mexican Erpobdella species by the combination of having the whole body strongly dorsoventrally flattened, three annuli between gonopores, an enlarged male gonopore, and no preatrial loops for the male reproductive system. Based on sequence data (mitochondrial cytochrome c oxidase subunit I and 12S; nuclear 18S), this new species appears most closely related to a clade formed by E. coastalis and E. ochoterenai. Both mitochondrial cytochrome c oxidase subunit I molecular barcodes and morphological descriptions of the collected species are presented.

INTRODUCTION

Mexico is well known as one of the world’s biodiversity hotspots (Ramamoorthy, 1993). Although collecting efforts for leeches have grown slowly, it is beginning to become clear that leeches are also diverse in Mexico. In the past decade a massive effort to collect leeches throughout the central states of Mexico has taken place (Oceguera-Figueroa and León-Règagnon, 2014). These explorations have been fruitful and clearly establish Mexico as ripe for leech discovery, with many endemics uncovered. Furthermore, these leeches are phylogenetically diverse, with representatives from over 70% of leech families (Oceguera-Figueroa and León-Règagnon, 2014).

No other area in North America has had so many recent leech species discoveries, and there is no sign of this rapid rate of discovery slowing (Oceguera-Figueroa and León-Règagnon, 2014). Concerted efforts to further collect and systematize Mexican leech diversity have filled in many of the gaps in records, collections, and undescribed diversity, especially from Central Mexico. Chiapas, the southernmost state of Mexico, has had few surveying efforts. Still, this work has resulted in interesting discoveries of endemic species, such as the mammalophilic leech Pintobdella chiapasensis Caballero, 1957, known only from Custepeques and Lagunas de Montebello (Caballero, 1957; Phillips et al., 2010), and a turtle-feeding species, Placobdella ringueleti López-Jiménez and Oceguera-Figueroa, 2009, from Laguna Bélgica, Bonampak, Rancho Alejandría, Malpaso Dam, Tuxtla Gutierrez, and Reforma. Furthermore, Haementeria acuecueyetzin Oceguera-Figueroa, 2008, was found parasitizing a manatee in Palenque, Chiapas, which is the first and only record of a leech feeding on a manatee (Pérez-Flores et al., 2016). In addition to these records, two species of leeches are known from the Colección Nacional de Helmintos (CNHE), Instituto de Biología, UNAM: Erpobdella triannulata Moore, 1908, from Lagunas de Montebello and Helobdella socimulcensis Caballero, 1931, from Presa Belisario Domínguez.

Overall, Chiapas has largely remained unexplored (Oceguera-Figueroa and León-Règagnon, 2014). In the present study, we provide a brief description of the morphology and genetic barcodes—mitochondrial cytochrome c oxidase subunit I fragment (cox1)—for each species newly collected in Chiapas. We present new localities for three species, a new country record, as well as the description and phylogenetic placement of a new species of macrophagous leech of the genus Erpobdella.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Leeches were collected in 2014 and 2015 from localities across Chiapas (fig. 1) under the permit SEMARNAT 12099 to A.O.-F. Collection techniques primarily followed two standard survey strategies: (1) bare-legged wading in water to attract blood-feeding leeches; and (2) a more active search for both blood-feeding and non-blood-feeding leeches by flipping over rocks, sticks, and vegetation both in and at the edge of the water. Both lentic and lotic sites were checked, but a greater focus was made on lentic sites due to their generally higher leech diversity. Additionally, terrestrial leeches in the Xerobdellidae were sought in moist forests by flipping over rocks and logs. Specimens were gradually relaxed in water with increasing concentrations of ethanol, and eventually fixed in 70%–90% ethanol. Collected leeches were identified and photographed under a stereomicroscope. In addition, in this study we include samples collected by other biologists as well as previously published records.

At least one specimen from each species collected was genetically barcoded with cox1. DNA extractions, amplifications, and sequencing protocols followed prior studies (Apakupakul et al., 1999; Borda and Siddall, 2004). For the new species of Erpobdella we amplified a longer fragment of cox1 using HHCO1 (developed at the AMNH) 5′-GCTGCAAAAATRGCAAATACTGC-3′ instead of HCO2198, but otherwise kept identical protocols (Apakupakul et al., 1999). For the new species, we also amplified the mitochondrial 12S following Simon et al. (1994) using 12Sa and 12Sb primers and nuclear 18S (amplified and sequenced using primers “A,” “B,” and “Y”) with the protocols found in Borda and Siddall (2004) and Apakupakul et al. (1999), respectively. Sequences were reconciled in Geneious version 6.1.8 (Biomatters Limited).

To determine the phylogenetic position of the new species within Erpobdella, a matrix was constructed for those Erpobdella species with sequence data available for cox1, 12S, and/or 18S (table 1). Sequences were aligned using MUSCLE (Edgar, 2004a, 2004b) through the “muscle” package in R (www.r-project.org/). Both parsimony via TNT (Goloboff et al., 2008) and maximum likelihood (ML) via Garli (Zwickl, 2006) were then used to infer the phylogeny. For ML reconstruction, loci were partitioned using models found with jModelTest 2.1.4 (Darriba et al., 2012). For both inferences, support was assessed using 1000 bootstrap pseudoreplicates, summarized on the ML tree using SumTrees (Sukumaran and Holder, 2010). Trees were visualized in FigTree v1.4.2 (Rambaut, 2014). Additionally, cox1 sequences were used to calculate genetic distances with the Kimura two-parameter using PAUP* 4.0b10 (Swofford, 2002).

FIGURE 1. Map of the State of Chiapas, Mexico, with the collecting localities of leeches.

SYSTEMATICS

Order Arhynchobdellida Blanchard, 1894

Family Erpobdellidae Blanchard, 1894

Erpobdella adani, n. sp.

Figures 2–6

Material Examined: Fifteen specimens collected in Río Fogótico, in Arcotete, Chiapas, Mexico, on January 23, 2016, by Michael Tessler, Samantha Contreras, Jairo Arroyave, and Alejandro Oceguera-Figueroa. Specimens were found beneath submerged rocks in moderately flowing water. Non-blood-feeding (macrophagous).

Description: External morphology based on 15 specimens. Body strongly dorsoventrally flattened, vermiform, slender. Dorsal surface dark gray, ventral surface lighter; some specimens with three longitudinal lines of black pigment, others lacking lines. Dorsal surface smooth, without conspicuous papillae or other sensory structures; ventral surface of some specimens covered with minute papillae (figs. 2, 3). Average body length 51 mm (35–64 mm), average body width 4 mm (2–5 mm). Complete somite five annulate. Clitellum conspicuous, thick both dorsally and ventrally, comprising 15 annuli, from X b5 to XIII a2. Male gonopore at XII b2/a2, female gonopore XII/XIII; three annuli between gonopores (fig. 4). Male gonopore large, conspicuous, and surrounded by an integumental disc; female gonopore small. Three pairs of eyespots in the classic “erpobdellid” arrangement with the anterior labial pair on III and two buccal pairs at IV. Mouth wide, occupying entire anterior sucker; anterior lip blunt (fig. 5). Anus large, on XXVI/XXVII. Posterior sucker weakly developed, ventrally directed, narrower than the posterior part of the body. Somites I–III unianulate, IV–V biannulate, VI three annulate, VII four annulate, VIII–XXIV five annulate, XXV three annulate, XXVI biannulate, XXVII unianulate.

Internal morphology based on the dissection of three specimens. Agnathous, pharynx strepsilaematous, muscular, extending to XIII/XIV. Crop tubular, acaecate, extending from XIV to XIX/XX; intestine acaecate extending to XXVI/XXVII. Male medial reproductive system with paired atrial horns directed anterolaterally, without preatrial loops (fig. 6). Ejaculatory ducts tubular, extending posteriorly to XVIII/XIX, continuing with multiple testisacs (forming grapelike clusters) reaching XXIV. Female medial reproductive system formed by tubular ovaries with a lateral first portion in XIII and then joining the median line of the body mass extending to XVI/XVII where the ovaries redirect anteriorly to XIII and then they follow the distribution of the lateral first portion of the ovaries ending laterally at XII/XIII (fig. 6).

Etymology: This species is named to remember Adán Enrique Gómez González (1980–2018). Adán was an enthusiastic biologist with a deep passion and knowledge of biodiversity from Mexico, in particular from Chiapas, where he was born and where the new species of Erpobdella was collected.

Holotype: Colección Nacional de Invertebrados, Instituto de Biología, UNAM (catalog number 21).

Paratypes: Eleven specimens, Colección Nacional de Invertebrados, Instituto de Biología, UNAM (catalog number 22); three specimens, American Museum of Natural History (AMNH_IZC 250222; GenBank accession numbers presented in table 1).

Type Locality: Río Fogótico, Arcotete, Chiapas, Mexico (16°44′46.5″N, 92°34′17.24″W; 2298 m).

Phylogenetic Analyses: The three loci reviewed did not differ for the three Erpobdella adani specimens sequenced. Erpobdella adani was found nested in an exclusively North American clade. It was found to be sister to an E. coastalis/E. ochoterenai Caballero, 1932, clade with moderate support (fig. 7). This combined clade was sister to E. mexicana (Dugès, 1876) in parsimony and sister to an E. mexicana/E. triannulata clade in ML analyses; however, these relationships had weak support in both analyses.

More generally, the phylogenetic inference resulted in two principal clades within the genus Erpobdella; these results are similar to previous analyses (Siddall, 2002; Oceguera-Figueroa et al., 2005, 2011). For both analyses, the two specimens of E. lineata (O.F. Müller, 1774) are not sister; E. lineata 2 (cox1 data only; specimen from Macedonia) grouped with the principally European clade, while E. lineata 1 (12S and 18S data only; specimen from Denmark) varied in its positioning.

Remarks: Only three other species of Erpobdella are known from Mexico: E. mexicana, E. ochoterenai, and E. triannulata, with only E. triannulata known from Chiapas. The new species, E. adani, is distinguished from E. mexicana and E. triannulata based on the male reproductive structures. While E. mexicana and E. triannulata have ejaculatory ducts forming a preatrial loop extending to XI before entering the atrial horns, in E. adani the preatrial loop is absent (fig. 6). In addition, E. mexicana has two annuli separating the gonopores while E. adani has three. In Central America, including Costa Rica, Guatemala, and Honduras (Oceguera-Figueroa and Pacheco-Chaves, 2012; Cornejo et al., 2015), only E. triannulata has been reported from this region, the southern limit of the distribution of the species of the genus.

Erpobdella ochoterenai, from Central Mexico, and E. coastalis and E. microstoma (Moore, 1901), both from the southeastern United States, are morphologically the most similar species to Erpobdella adani. These species have three annuli between gonopores and lack preatrial loops of the ejaculatory ducts. However, in E. adani the body is strongly dorsoventrally flattened, from the preclitellar region to the posterior sucker. This characteristic is constant in the specimens studied and apparently not related to the process of narcotization-fixation. This contrasts with E. ochoterenai, E. coastalis, and E. microstoma, which are terete for the anterior two thirds of the body and dorsoventrally flattened only for the last third of the body (Moore, 1945; A.O.-F., personal obs.). Additionally, E. adani has the male gonopore unusually enlarged, in some cases occupying almost all of b2 and half of a2 of somite XII, a character not seen in other members of the genus.

The average cox1 genetic distances for samples of the new species is 13% divergent from Erpobdella ochoterenai and 18% from E. coastalis, values that independent of morphology indicate that both groups likely represent separate species.

FIGURES 2–6. Erpobdella adani. 2. Holotype, dorsal view. 3. Holotype, ventral view. 4. Paratype, male gonopore (black arrow), female gonopore (white arrow). 5. Paratype, ventral anterior end, anterior sucker. 6. Illustration of the male (dark gray) and female (light gray) reproductive systems, atrial horns (ah), ejaculatory duct (ed), ventral nerve cord (nc), ovary (ov); testisacs not shown.

FIGURE 7. Maximum likelihood phylogenetic reconstruction of the family Erpobdellidae focused on establishing the closest relatives to Erpobdella adani. Support values are based on 1000 bootstrap pseudoreplicates.

Other Taxa

Order Arhynchobdellida Blanchard, 1894

Family Erpobdellidae Blanchard, 1894

Erpobdella triannulata Moore, 1908

Figures 8–9

The presence of three pairs of eyespots, two pairs of longitudinal lines on the dorsal surface, three annuli between gonopores, ejaculatory ducts forming preatrial loops, and medium body size correspond to the description of Erpobdella triannulata (Oceguera-Figueroa et al., 2005). Found on the underside of submerged rocks and roots of aquatic plants. Non-blood-feeding (macrophagous). New locality records: Palenque (17°29′10″N, 92°01′10″W; 77 m), four specimens collected March, 2015, by J. Pérez-Flores, (CNI 23); Osumacinta Dam (16°57′47.5″N, 93°06′21.82″W; 207 m), 22 specimens collected January 24, 2016, by M. Tessler, J. Arroyave, S. Contreras, and A. Oceguera-Figueroa, (CNHE 24). GenBank cox1 barcode sequence accessions: MG821606 and MG821607.

FIGURES 8–11. Arhynchobdellida from Chiapas, Mexico. Erpobdella triannulata: 8. dorsal view, 9. ventral view. Diestecostoma octannulata: 10. dorsal view, 11. ventral view.

Family Xerobdellidae Moore, 1946

Borda, Oceguera-Figueroa, and Siddall, 2008

Diestecostoma octannulata Moore, 1946

Figures 10–11

The presence of five eyespot pairs arranged in a parabolic arc (first four pairs on contiguous annuli and two annuli separating fourth and fifth pair), complete somite eight annulate (16 + 1/2 annuli between gonopores) is consistent with the description of Diestecostoma octannulata Moore, 1946. Found in a rotten tree under the bark. Terrestrial leech; presumably non-blood-feeding (macrophagous). New country record; new state record; new locality record: Mexico, Volcán Tacaná, la Caracola (15°06′19.39″N, 92°05′47.27″W; 2452 m), one specimen collected July, 25, 2015, by Alejandro Oceguera-Figueroa (CNI 15). GenBank cox1 barcode sequence accession: MG821605.

Order Rhynchobdellida Blanchard, 1894

Family Glossiphoniidae Vaillant, 1890

Helobdella elongata Castle, 1900

Figures 12–13

The absence of a chitinous nuchal scute; presence of an unpigmented, nonpapillated, and subcylindrical body in cross section; and weak anterior and posterior suckers all correspond to the description of Helobdella elongata. Specimens lacked eyespots, a characteristic noticed before for some individuals of this species from other localities (Klemm, 1982). Found on the underside of submerged rocks and accidentally attached to skin. Non-blood-feeding (liquidosomatophagous). Cox1 genetic distances of H. elongata from Chiapas are around 10% divergent from other samples of the same species from other localities. This suggests that samples from Chiapas may represent an undescribed species. New state record; new locality records: Tres Lagunas, Chiapas (16°50′33.9″N, 91°08′46.69″W; 370 m) 4 specimens collected January 27, 2016 by M. Tessler, J. Arroyave, S. Contreras and A. Oceguera-Figueroa (CNI 25); Bosque Azul, Chiapas (16°07′37.83″N, 91°43′53.68″W; 1462 m) 3 specimens collected January 25, 2016 by M. Tessler, J. Arroyave, S. Contreras and A. Oceguera-Figueroa (CNI 26). GenBank cox1 barcode sequence accessions: MG821608, MG821609, and MG821610.

Helobdella octatestisaca Lai and Chang, 2009

Figures 14–15

The presence of a chitinous nuchal scute; dorsal and ventral surfaces with inconspicuous papillae; no metameric pigmentation patterns; eyespots in one pair, each shaped somewhat triangularly, almost touching each other is consistent with the description of Helobdella octatestisaca (see Salas-Montiel et al., 2014). Found on the underside of submerged rocks and plants. Non-blood-feeding (liquidosomatophagous). New state record; new locality records: Bosque Azul, Lagunas de Montebello (16°07′37.83″N, 91°43′53.68″W; 1462 m) 30 specimens collected January 25, 2016, by M. Tessler, J. Arroyave, S. Contreras, and A. Oceguera-Figueroa (CNI 27); Osumacinta Dam (16°57′47.5″N, 93°06′21.82″W; 207 m) 16 specimens collected January 24, 2016, by M. Tessler, J. Arroyave, S. Contreras, and A. Oceguera-Figueroa (CNI 28). GenBank cox1 barcode sequence accessions: MG821611, MG821612, MG821613, and MG821614.

Helobdella socimulcensis Caballero, 1931

Figures 16–17

The presence of dorsal surface with complex pattern of longitudinal stripes and metameric papillae; nuchal scute absent; eyespots in one pair, punctiform, well separated from each other is consistent with the description of Helobdella socimulcensis (see Salas-Montiel et al., 2014). Found on the underside of submerged rocks and plants. Non-blood-feeding (liquidosomatophagous). New locality records: Río Fogótico, Arcotete, Chiapas, Mexico (16°44′46.5″N, 92°34′17.24″W; 2298 m), collected January 23, 2016, by M. Tessler, J. Arroyave, S. Contreras, and A. Oceguera-Figueroa (CNI 29). GenBank cox1 barcode sequence accessions: MG821615 and MG821616.

Placobdella ringueleti López-Jiménez and Oceguera-Figueroa, 2009

Figures 18–19

The presence of two pairs of eyespots in close contact, a single dorsal longitudinal stripe, and a papillated dorsal surface is consistent with the description of Placobdella ringueleti. New locality record: Palenque (17°29′10″N, 92°01′10″W; 68 m), collected March, 2015, by J. Pérez-Flores (CNHE 10455). GenBank cox1 barcode sequence accession: MG821617.

CONCLUSIONS

With the description of Erpobdella adani there are now 33 known leech species from Mexico (Oceguera-Figueroa and León-Règagnon, 2014; Salas-Montiel et al., 2014). Accordingly, the nine species found in Chiapas (six non-blood-feeding and three blood-feeding) represent 27% of the leeches found in Mexico. Four of the 10 leech families known from Mexico (40%) were found as well. The diversity found thus far in Chiapas is similar to that known from the relatively well-surveyed central states of Mexico. However, the diversity of the state is surely higher than presently known. For example, the marine species of the Piscicolidae and Ozobranchidae have yet to be surveyed in the area, as far as we are aware.

All but two leech species found are aquatic. The terrestrial leech Diestecostoma octannulata is previously known only from Volcán Tajumulco, Guatemala (Moore, 1946), and thus the record reported here expands the known distribution of this species to Mexico. Another terrestrial leech is potentially known for the state: D. magna Moore, 1945 (Oceguera-Figueroa and León-Règagnon, 2014); however, the type locality of this species is ambiguous, being between the states of Veracruz and Chiapas (Moore, 1945). Two Helobdella species were found in addition to the previous record of H. socimulcensis—these three species are relatively widespread in Mexico and correspond to half of the known Mexican Helobdella species (Salas-Montiel et al., 2014). However, H. elongata from Chiapas might be a new taxon given the elevated genetic distances in comparison with samples from other localities in Mexico. The three blood-feeding species, Pintobdella chiapasensis, Placobdella ringueleti, and Haementeria acuecueyetzin were found in prior works (Caballero, 1957; López-Jiménez and Oceguera-Figueroa, 2009; Phillips et al., 2010; Pérez-Flores et al., 2016).

The addition of the new species, Erpobdella adani, along with current and prior records of E. triannulata represent half of the four Erpobdella species now known from Mexico (Oceguera-Figueroa and León-Règagnon, 2014). Erpobdella adani is phylogenetically distinct from those Erpobdella species included in the analysis. It is generally closely related to the other three species known from Mexico, as well as most of the North American Erpobdella. Of the three other Mexican species, E. adani is most closely related to E. ochoterenai. The relationships recovered for Mexican Erpobdella in our analyses are largely consistent with prior work (Oceguera-Figueroa et al., 2005, 2011), insofar as the positions of E. mexicana and E. ochoterenai are consistent while E. triannulata varies in its position depending on the analysis.

Unlike the other Mexican species that are broadly distributed (Oceguera-Figueroa and León-Règagnon, 2014), Erpobdella adani was found only in a single stream. Future collecting efforts for this species should concentrate on more streams in Chiapas and possibly in nearby Guatemala, which, like much of Central America, remains largely unsurveyed for leech diversity. Until then, it will be hard to determine how restricted the range is of this putative endemic. It is also worth noting that leech-collecting efforts generally focus on lacustrine habitats, while E. adani was found in lotic conditions. Furthermore, these conditions made it generally hard to spot and collect.

FIGURES 12–15. Rhynchobdellida from Chiapas, Mexico. Helobdella elongata: 12. dorsal view, 13. ventral view. Helobdella octatestisaca: 14. dorsal view, 15. ventral view.

FIGURES 16–19. Rhynchobdellida from Chiapas, Mexico. Helobdella socimulcensis: 16. dorsal view, 17. ventral view. Placobdella ringueleti: 18. dorsal view, 19. ventral view.

ACKNOWLEDGMENTS

We would like to thank the AMNH Roosevelt Grant for funding fieldwork for M.T. and the PAPIIT-IA202016 and IA204114 projects awarded to A.O.-F. for funding fieldwork and laboratory expenses; Ofelia Delgado, Gisela Martínez Flores, Andrea Jiménez Marín, and Laura Márquez for providing assistance in the molecular lab; Jairo Arroyave, Samantha Contreras, Héctor Tejero, and Iris Méndez for help collecting leech specimens; Luis García Prieto and Lily Berniker for support in the collection management; and Susana Gómez for aiding with the preparation of pictures.

REFERENCES

Apakupakul, K., M.E. Siddall, and E.M. Burreson. 1999. Higher level relationships of leeches (Annelida: Clitellata: Euhirudinea) based on morphology and gene sequences. Molecular Phylogenetics and Evolution 12: 350–359.

Borda, E., and M.E. Siddall. 2004. Arhynchobdellida (Annelida: Oligochaeta: Hirudinida): phylogenetic relationships and evolution. Molecular Phylogenetics and Evolution 30: 213–225.

Caballero, C.E. 1957. Description of a new species of leech, coming from the forests of the state of Chiapas. Anales del Instituto de Biologia de la Universidad Nacional Autonoma de Mexico 28: 241–245.

Cornejo, A., A. Oceguera-Figueroa, and J. Bernal-Vega. 2015. Sanguijuelas (Annelida: Clitellata) de agua dulce de Panamá: comparación con la riqueza de especies de Centro América. Puente Biológico 1: 1–13.

Darriba, D., G.L. Taboada, R. Doallo, and D. Posada. 2012. jModelTest 2: more models, new heuristics and parallel computing. Nature Methods 9: 772.

Edgar, R.C. 2004a. MUSCLE: a multiple sequence alignment method with reduced time and space complexity. BMC Bioinformatics 5: 113.

Edgar, R.C. 2004b. MUSCLE: multiple sequence alignment with high accuracy and high throughput. Nucleic Acids Research 32: 1792–1797.

Goloboff, P.A., J.S. Farris, and K.C. Nixon. 2008. TNT, a free program for phylogenetic analysis. Cladistics 24: 774–786.

Klemm, D.J. 1982. Leeches (Annelida: Hirudinea) of North America. U.S. Environmental Protection Agency.

López-Jiménez, S., and A. Oceguera-Figueroa. 2009. New species of rhynchobdellid leech (Hirudinea: Glossiphoniidae): a parasite of turtles from Chiapas, Mexico. Journal of Parasitology 95: 1356–1359.

Moore, J.P. 1945. Two new leeches (Hirudinea) in the collection of the United States National Museum. Journal of the Washington Academy of Sciences 35: 261–265.

Moore, J.P. 1946. Leeches (Hirudinea) from the Hawaiian Islands, and two new species from the Pacific region in the Bishop Museum collection. Occasional Papers of Bernice P. Bishop Museum 18: 171–191.

Oceguera-Figueroa, A., A.J. Phillips, B. Pacheco-Chaves, W.K. Reeves, and M.E. Siddall. 2011. Phylogeny of macrophagous leeches (Hirudinea, Clitellata) based on molecular data and evaluation of the barcoding locus. Zoologica Scripta 40: 194–203.

Oceguera-Figueroa, A., and V. León-Règagnon. 2014. Biodiversidad de sanguijuelas (Annelida: Euhirudinea) en México. Revista Mexicana de Biodiversidad 85: S183–S189.

Oceguera-Figueroa, A., V. León-Règagnon, and M.E. Siddall. 2005. Phylogeny and revision of Erpobdelliformes (Annelida, Arhynchobdellida) from Mexico based on nuclear and mitochondrial gene sequences. Revista Mexicana de Biodiversidad 76: 191–198.

Oceguera-Figueroa, A., and B. Pacheco-Chaves. 2012. Registros de sanguijuelas de Costa Rica y clave para la identificación de las especies con redescripción de Cylicobdella costaricae. Revista Mexicana de Biodiversidad 83: 946–957.

Pérez-Flores, J., H. Rueda-Calderon, S. Kvist, M.E. Siddall, and A. Oceguera-Figueroa. 2016. From the worm in a bottle of mezcal: iDNA confirmation of a leech parasitizing the Antillean manatee. Journal of Parasitology 102: 553–555.

Phillips, A.J., et al. 2010. Tyrannobdella rex n. gen. n. sp. and the evolutionary origins of mucosal leech infestations. PLoS One 5: e10057.

Ramamoorthy, T.P. 1993. Biological diversity of Mexico: origins and distribution. New York: Oxford University Press.

Rambaut, A. 2014. FigTree version 1.4.2. Internet resource (http://tree.bio.ed.ac.uk/software/figtree/).

Salas-Montiel, R., A.J. Phillips, G. Perez-Ponce De Leon, and A. Oceguera-Figueroa. 2014. Description of a new leech species of Helobdella (Clitellata: Glossiphoniidae) from Mexico with a review of Mexican congeners and a taxonomic key. Zootaxa 3900: 77–94.

Siddall, M.E. 2002. Phylogeny of the leech family Erpobdellidae (Hirudinida: Oligochaeta). Invertebrate Systematics 16: 1–6.

Simon, C., F. Frati, A. Beckenbach, B. Crespi, H. Liu, and P. Flook. 1994. Evolution, weighting, and phylogenetic utility of mitochondrial gene sequences and a compilation of conserved polymerase chain reaction primers. Annals of the Entomological Society of America 87: 651–701.

Sukumaran, J., and M.T. Holder. 2010. DendroPy: a Python library for phylogenetic computing. Bioinformatics 26: 1569–1571.

Swofford, D.L. 2002. PAUP*: Phylogenetic analysis using parsimony (*and other methods) ver. 4.0b10. Massachusetts: Sinauer Associates.

Zwickl, D.J. 2006. Genetic algorithm approaches for the phylogenetic analysis of large biological sequence datasets under the maximum likelihood criterion. Texas: University of Texas at Austin.

1 Division of Invertebrate Zoology, American Museum of Natural History; Sackler Institute for Comparative Genomics, American Museum of Natural History; and Richard Gilder Graduate School, American Museum of Natural History.

2 Division of Invertebrate Zoology, American Museum of Natural History; Sackler Institute for Comparative Genomics, American Museum of Natural History.

3 Laboratorio de Helmintología, Instituto de Biología, Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México. Ciudad de México, México.