AMERICAN MUSEUM NOVITATES

Number 3834: 13 pp. April 30, 2015

Copyright © American Museum of Natural History 2015

ISSN 0003-0082

The Mitochondrial Genome of Allonautilus (Mollusca: Cephalopoda): Base Composition, Noncoding-Region Variation, and Phylogenetic Divergence

JEFF G. GROTH,[1] ILANA ARBISSER,[2] NEIL H. LANDMAN,[3] AND GEORGE F. BARROWCLOUGH[4]

ABSTRACT

We used next-generation methods to sequence the mitochondrial genome of Allonautilus scrobiculatus from two large, overlapping amplicons generated by PCR. The genome was circular, 16,132 base pairs in length, and possessed the same sequence and orientation of genes as the previously sequenced mitogenome of Nautilus macromphalus. These two mitogenomes were approximately 8% divergent overall, but differentiation varied greatly among genes: some tRNA sequences were identical between the two taxa, whereas ATP8 differed by over 15%. The largest of the noncoding regions of the genome included a 62 base pair repeat that was essentially identical between the two genera; however, this repeat was present as six copies in N. macromphalus, but varied between four and five among individuals of Allonautilus. A 146 base pair deletion (in Allonautilus compared to Nautilus) included one copy of the repeat plus an adjacent 84 bp; because of this indel, the “CA” microsatellite in N. macromphalus was missing from Allonautilus. Base composition varied along the Allonautilus sequence, and was correlated with the strand on which genes coded. Base composition also varied within the largest noncoding region. A phylogeny of 24 extant cephalopods indicates that there is less molecular divergence between Allonautilus and Nautilus than there is among congeneric species of Octopus and Sepia.

INTRODUCTION

The close morphological resemblance of the shells of modern nautilids to those of extinct, shelled cephalopods has given them the cachet of a “living fossil” (Woodruff et al., 1987). Nautilus and Allonautilus are the only two extant genera of externally shelled cephalopods and comprise the sister taxon to all other living cephalopods, including Sepiida, Octopoda, and Teuthida (Nishiguchi and Mapes, 2008). Nautilus is widely distributed at archipelagos throughout the Indo-Pacific. Allonautilus, on the other hand, is more restricted in its distribution, and live specimens of this genus have only been collected from Papua New Guinea and the Solomon Islands (Saunders et al., 1987; Ward and Saunders, 1997). The natural history of these animals is poorly known as a result of their relatively deepwater habitat (Saunders and Ward, 1987), but thanks to recent studies, our understanding of their ecology and distribution is vastly improving (Dunstan et al., 2011; Sinclair et al., 2011; Barord et al., 2014).

Fewer than a dozen species of extant nautilids remain of a once large and widespread radiation (Teichert and Matsumoto, 1987), although the exact number of present-day species is still a subject of debate (Bonacum et al., 2011). Many of these species are known only from drift shells (House, 1987), but at least five of them, including Nautilus macromphalus Sowerby, 1849, have been caught as live animals (Saunders, 1987). Ward and Saunders (1997) established the new genus Allonautilus containing A. scrobiculatus [Lightfoot, 1786][5] and A. perforatus (Conrad, 1847). This generic assignment was challenged almost immediately (Harvey et al., 1999; Ward, 1999), although subsequent analyses based on molecular data (Bonacum et al., 2011) have demonstrated that Allonautilus is the sister taxon of Nautilus. Allonautilus differs from Nautilus in terms of the shape of the shell and size of the umbilicus, the thickness of the periostracum, and the number of tubercles on the hood (see fig. 1 for a comparison of shell characters of A. scrobiculatus and N. macromphalus).

At present, the complete mitogenomes of approximately 470 members of the phylum Mollusca are known, but only 23 of these are cephalopods among which is only one nautilid (Stöger and Schrödl, 2013). Because there are known to be extensive mitochondrial gene rearrangements within cephalopods (Akasaki et al., 2006; Kawashima et al., 2013), and because the gene arrangement of the sole sequenced nautilid (Nautilus macromphalus) was found to differ from that of the other cephalopods, it is important to determine whether the pattern observed in N. macromphalus characterized the rest of the order. Consequently, we sequenced the mitogenome of Allonautilus scrobiculatus, which appears to represent the basalmost split among extant members of the order (Bonacum et al., 2011; Bonnaud et al., 2004). Prior to this study, little molecular data were available for Allonautilus. Wray et al. (1995) reported some mitochondrial (16S) and nuclear (28S) sequences and Bonnaud et al. (2004) analyzed the 18S sequence, but all these ribosomal genes are conserved across a wide array of taxa. Subsequently, Bonacum et al. (2011) reported on the more rapidly evolving mitochondrial CO1 locus, but the sequences, from three individuals, represented only a fragment of one gene. Thus, a complete mitochondrial sequence can provide useful information for future molecular research on living cephalopods in general and nautilids in particular.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

We obtained tissue samples from three individuals of Allonautilus scrobiculatus captured near Little Ndrova Island, Papua New Guinea, in 1984 and 1985. The specimens, collected alive, were preserved in ethanol and maintained in the frozen-tissue collections of the American Museum of Natural History; their accession numbers are: AMCC224107, AMCC224111, and AMCC224119. DNA was extracted from the samples using standard QIAGEN preparations; the extracts were subjected to agarose gel electrophoresis to determine DNA quality.

The published mitogenome of Nautilus macromphalus (NCBI Reference Sequence: NC_007980.1) contains six copies of a 62 bp repeat in its largest noncoding region (Boore, 2006). We designed PCR primers (repNmac1: 5′-CAAATCTTCTCGTGCACTCCACA and repNmac2: 5′-GGTTTACAAGGCCGCTACTT) to amplify and sequence this region for three individuals of A. scrobiculatus using standard Sanger-sequencing methods on an ABI3730xl DNA Analyzer; the resulting sequences were assembled and aligned by eye using Sequencher, version 4.7 (Gene Codes Corp.).

Sequences for four PCR primers for amplifying the mitochondrial genome in two large fragments (Boore et al., 2005) were based on the published (Boore, 2006) Nautilus sequence. One primer pair (Nmac32: 5′-GCAGCTAACATGGGAGCCGGACACAT and Nmac61: 5′-CGTGGAGTCCGTGAAAGCCTGT) spanned the region between the ATP6 and CO3 genes, with a predicted size of approximately 7 kb. The other pair (Nmac5: 5′-GAGTTTAGTCCCTGGCCCCTCACAGG and Nmac4: 5′-GGGTGGGATGGGCTGGGGTTGGTTTC) spanned the region between the CO3 and ND5 genes, with a predicted size of approximately 11 kb. Expected overlaps between the fragments were 1537 and 541 bases. Long-distance PCR amplifications were performed using Promega GoTaqTM Long PCR Master Mix in 50 μl volumes. The two PCR products were cleaned by centrifugation dialysis and combined in approximately equimolar amounts; a total of 500 ng of this mixture was nebulized and prepared as a single DNA library according to protocols for the Roche 454 GS Junior. The sequences resulting from the library were processed using the GS De Novo Assembler analysis software using default parameters. The assembled contigs were then imported into Geneious, version 6.1.7 (Biomatters Ltd.), for further analysis and visualization.

The assembled Allonautilus genome was aligned with that of N. macromphalus and adjusted by eye. Gene delimitation and annotation were based on an analysis using MITOS version 630 (Bernt et al., 2013) and comparison to the published Nautilus sequence. The protein-coding loci were translated into amino acids using the standard invertebrate mitochondrial genetic code. For all comparisons, percent sequence divergence was computed as 100 times the number of base pair substitutions divided by the relevant sequence length. For the purposes of assessing genetic divergence between Allonautilus and Nautilus, we treated the coding loci as comprised of three separate classes: protein-coding genes, ribosomal RNAs, and transfer RNAs. Our assessment of the structural positions of t-RNA substitutions was based on comparison with the secondary structures proposed by Boore (2006).

We assessed base composition heterogeneity around the Allonautilus genome by plotting the frequencies of T and G nucleotides in all of the protein and ribosomal genes, as well as in the largest noncoding region, by coding strand. Base composition heterogeneity within the largest noncoding region of the mitogenome was assessed by plotting the frequencies of G and T nucleotides, in a 100 bp sliding window, along the length of that region.

We estimated mitochondrial genetic variation among the three specimens of Allonautilus by comparing the Sanger-sequenced fragments of the largest noncoding region for percentage of bases that were variable among individuals and for Nei’s (1987) estimator of nucleotide diversity (π); for these estimates, deletions were treated as missing.

In order to place the divergence between A. scrobiculatus and N. macromphalus within a larger context, we searched GenBank for deposits of complete mitogenomes of cephalopods. For such species, the slower-evolving COX and ATPase genes were aligned with the N. macromphalus and newly sequenced Allonautilus genes. Those two gene families code on the same DNA strand in mollusks and thus have similar base composition; they also are subject to many fewer alignment ambiguities caused by indels than is the NAD family of genes, particularly with respect to an outgroup. We computed the percentage of sequence divergence among all these taxa, and used PAUP* version 4.0b10 (Swofford, 2001) to infer maximum parsimony trees, using a chiton, Katharina tunicata, as an outgroup. In this analysis, we used random addition of taxa, with 25 replicates, and a heuristic search with TBR branch swapping. We also performed a bootstrap analysis, with 1000 replicates, using the same parsimony procedure described above within each replicate.

RESULTS

The Allonautilus Mitogenome

The primer pair repNmac1/repNmac2, which was designed to amplify a large portion of the noncoding region, produced fragments of 608 bp and 670 bp, depending on the individual. The PCR products sequenced cleanly only in the forward direction; the presence of a T homopolymer, 11 bases long, near the repNmac2 primer prevented clean reverse reads using Sanger methods. This T polymer was also reported for the N. macromphalus mitogenome. These partial sequences of the largest noncoding region for the three specimens have been deposited in GenBank (KP862897–KP862899).

The specimen of A. scrobiculatus with the largest noncoding region (AMCC224119) was used for further sequencing using next-generation techniques. We obtained a single largest contig nearly 17 kb in length containing 10,690 sequences ranging in size from 40 bp to 657 bp, with an average length of approximately 350 bp; overall depth of coverage was approximately 230×. The contig was aligned to the published N. macromphalus mitogenome and rearranged so that the starting point was the CO1 gene. The assembled genome was circular, 16,132 base pairs in length, and was composed of the same sequence and orientation of 37 genes (fig. 2) previously found in N. macromphalus (Boore, 2006). The complete sequence has been annotated and deposited in GenBank (KP892752).

Figure 1. Allonautilus differs from Nautilus in the size and shape of the umbilicus, type of periostracum, and texture of the hood (e.g., Saunders et al., 1987). A. Allonautilus scrobiculatus, Little Ndrova Island, Papua New Guinea, AMNH 101045. B. Nautilus macromphalus, New Caledonia, AMNH 94104.

Divergence between Allonautilus and Nautilus

We observed a large (146 bp) deletion, compared to N. macromphalus, in the largest (826 bp) noncoding region of Allonautilus (fig. 3). This deletion, approximately 125 bp from the 5′ end of the noncoding region, included the “CA” microsatellite reported for Nautilus, as well as one copy of a 62 bp repeat. The latter was present as six copies in N. macromphalus, but, as a consequence of the deletion, was present as five copies in the completely sequenced Allonautilus; in two other specimens there were only four copies. This repeated element was essentially identical to one reported for N. macromphalus (Boore, 2006). Aside from the deleted repeats, this large noncoding region of the two genera of nautilus was about 20% divergent for its first 120 bases, and nearly identical thereafter.

As in N. macromphalus, four additional, relatively large (> 50 bp), noncoding regions exist in the Allonautilus mitochondrial genome (fig. 2). One of these, the nearly 100 bp spacer between the glycine tRNA and ATP6, was 37% divergent from that of Nautilus; two others, between the threonine and glycine tRNAs and between the glutamate tRNA and CO3, were 3.3% and 10.7% divergent, respectively. The last large spacer, between the arginine and asparagine tRNAs, was 22 bp longer in Allonautilus than N. macromphalus due to a large insertion.

The overall sequence divergence (excluding indels) between the Allonautilus and N. macromphalus mitogenomes was 8.3% for coding genes, but this varied greatly within and among classes of genes. For the 13 protein-coding loci, divergence varied between about 6% and 15%, with a mean of 9.1% (table 1). The two genera were 6.5% and 9.0% divergent for 12S and 16S ribosomal RNAs, respectively, and 7.8% divergent overall (table 2). For the 22 tRNAs, differentiation varied between zero and 10.8%, averaging 3.7% (table 3). For all 37 coding genes, transitions exceeded transversions by a ratio of five to one.

Fourteen percent of the substitutions between Allonautilus and N. macromphalus in the protein-coding loci resulted in amino acid changes. Ten of the proteins used ATG start codons and three used GTG codons. These three GTG initiation codons were for the same three genes (ND3, ND4, and ND5) observed to have GTG starts in Nautilus (Boore, 2006).

There were 53 changes in tRNA sequences between the two nautilids. Approximately two-thirds of these were in loops or extra arms, and therefore had no effect on the secondary structure of the molecules. Two-thirds of the substitutions occurring within stem regions involved changes between A-U and G-U pairing in the RNA product; two transitions in an arginine tRNA stem compensated for each other.

Figure 2. Arrangement of the mitogenome of Allonautilus scrobiculatus; the lengths of the individual genes are drawn approximately to scale. Genes encoding on the same strand as CO1 are shown (in white) on the outer portion of the circular genome and are transcribed in the clockwise direction. Genes on the other strand are transcribed in the counterclockwise direction and are indicated on the inner portion of the genome and shaded in blue; the nine largest noncoding regions (20 bp or greater) are shown in gray.

Figure 3. Architecture of the large noncoding region of extant nautilid mitogenomes. Features are shown for the strand on which CO1 is coded. Nautilus macromphalus (Boore, 2006) was characterized by a microsatellite, six copies of a 62 bp repeat (R1–R6), and a poly-T monomer; in Allonautilus, the microsatellite and first copy of the repeat were missing in one individual (indel pattern A), and an additional repeat was missing in two other individuals (indel pattern B); all individuals possessed the poly-T monomer (blue bar). The frequency of T and G nucleotides varied considerably through the noncoding region: their frequencies, in a 100 bp sliding window, are shown in the lower panel.

Table 1. Divergence between Allonautilus scrobiculatus and Nautilus macromphalus at protein-coding loci.

Gene

Length (bp)

Number of Substitutions

Number of Transitions

Number of Transversions

Number of Amino Acid Substitutions

ATP6

696

88 (12.6%)

68

20

16

ATP8

159

24 (15.1%)

20

4

7

CO1

1533

145 (9.5%)

128

17

1

CO2

682

77 (11.3%)

65

12

7

CO3

780

74 (9.5%)

60

14

7

Cyt-b

1133

70 (6.2%)

51

19

15

ND1

933

70 (7.5%)

58

12

8

ND2

1029

94 (9.1%)

83

11

18

ND3

353

49 (13.9%)

43

6

7

ND4

1349

125 (9.3%)

102

23

21

ND4L

294

21 (7.1%)

19

2

4

ND5

1719

136 (7.9%)

112

24

20

ND6

505

38 (7.5%)

31

7

11

Table 2. Divergence between Allonautilus scrobiculatus and Nautilus macromphalus at ribosomal RNA loci.

rRNA

Length (bp; in Allonautilus)

Number of Substitutions

Number of Transitions

Number of Transversions

Number of Indels

12S

884

55 (6.5%)

49

6

3 (1 bp, 1 bp, 7 bp)

16S

1347

120 (9.0%)

96

24

1 (1 bp)

Table 3. Divergence between Allonautilus scrobiculatus and Nautilus macromphalus at transfer RNA loci.

tRNA

Code

Length (bp)

Number of Substitutions

Number of Transitions

Number of Transversions

Alanine

A

66

4 (6.1%)

4

0

Arginine

R

64

3 (4.7%)

2

1

Asparagine

N

65

7 (10.8%)

5

2

Aspartic acid

D

66

1 (1.5%)

0

1

Cysteine

C

62

1 (1.6%)

1

0

Glutamic Acid

E

69

4 (5.8%)

4

0

Glutamine

Q

68

6 (8.8%)

5

1

Glycine

G

66

2 (3.0%)

2

0

Histidine

H

63

1 (1.6%)

1

0

Isoleucine

I

68

4 (5.9%)

4

0

Leucine

L1

67

1 (1.5%)

1

0

Leucine

L2

64

1 (1.6%)

1

0

Lysine

K

65

0 (0.0%)

0

0

Methionine

M

67

3 (4.5%)

3

0

Phenylalanine

F

65

0 (0.0%)

0

0

Proline

P

66

3 (4.5%)

3

0

Serine

S1

67

1 (1.5%)

0

1

Serine

S2

66

2 (3.0%)

1

1

Threonine

T

68

1 (1.5%)

1

0

Tryptophan

W

66

1 (1.5%)

1

0

Tyrosine

Y

68

2 (2.9%)

2

0

Valine

V

66

5 (7.6%)

5

0

Base Composition

The Allonautilus genome was composed of 60.1% A+T bases and 39.9% G+C bases, but this varied considerably along the sequence, as was previously observed in N. macromphalus (Boore, 2006). Protein-coding genes transcribed on the same strand as CO1 were substantially richer in T and G nucleotides than those on the other DNA strand (fig. 4). The two ribosomal genes had approximately the same T and G composition as the CO1-strand proteins, even though they coded on the other strand. The large noncoding region had base composition equivalent to the CO1 family of genes.

The percentage of T and G nucleotides also varied within the large noncoding region. They were approximately 20% and 10%, respectively, at the 5′ end of the region, oscillated through the repeat section, and then diverged near the 3′ end of the region (fig. 3). At one point there was a section of sequence, more than 100 bp in extent, with no G nucleotides and T content of 50%.

Variation within Allonautilus

We sequenced 80% or more of the large noncoding region of the mitogenome for three specimens of Allonautilus. Two individuals had four copies of a 62 bp repeat; the third individual had five copies. Additional base pair substitutions at five sites resulted in three haplotypes for the three specimens. The percentage of variable sites was 0.82% and nucleotide diversity was 0.0055.

Evolutionary Relationships

We inferred the phylogenetic relationships among Allonautilus and those cephalopods whose complete mitogenomes had been deposited in GenBank. The GenBank sequences included representatives of the squids, bobtail squids, cuttlefish, octopi, and vampire squids, as well as of Nautilus; the GenBank accession numbers of the sequences used are available from the authors. Because the base composition of loci on opposite coding strands varied greatly (fig. 4) and there were many overlapping indels in the NAD genes, we prepared a Nexus file of the COX and ATPase genes coding on the same strand for our analysis (3843 bp). The PAUP* analysis resulted in a single most-parsimonious tree (fig. 5). The tree had a total length of 11,019 steps and a consistency index (excluding uninformative characters) of 0.3421.

An uncorrected matrix of percent sequence divergences (not shown) indicated that variation (for the five COX and ATPase loci) varied between approximately 6% and 34% among cephalopods, and between 34% and 39% between cephalopods and Katharina.

Figure 4. Base composition of the major genes (excluding tRNAs) in the mitogenome of Allonautilus. Plus-strand (+) defined as the coding strand for CO1.

Figure 5. Phylogenetic relationships among some cephalopod species (and their orders) based on mitochondrial DNA sequences. Parsimony phylogram is based on COX and ATPase genes for cephalopod species whose mitogenomes have been sequenced; Katharina tunicata was used as an outgroup (not shown). Bootstrap values are shown along branches.

DISCUSSION

The Allonautilus Mitogenome

The A. scrobiculatus genome was found to have a gene order arrangement (fig. 2) identical to that of the previously sequenced N. macromphalus. Consequently, it appears that the novel arrangement reported for N. macromphalus may characterize the extant nautilids. There were a few length differences between the two genera in noncoding regions due to insertions or deletions; notably, a microsatellite as well as one of the repeats present in N. macromphalus were absent from the Allonautilus mitogenome. Overall sequence divergence between the two nautilids was approximately 8.3%.

Variation within Allonautilus

We observed a modest amount of genetic diversity in the large noncoding region among three individuals of Allonautilus scrobiculatus that we sampled. Because neutral variation is expected to scale approximately with population size (Kimura, 1983), this result suggests that substantial numbers of individuals of this species must exist, in spite of their limited geographic range. The census data available with regard to population sizes of these organisms is limited and ambiguous (Dunstan et al., 2011; Barord et al., 2014). Woodruff et al. (1987) documented genetic variation in A. scrobiculatus using an indirect electrophoretic approach that assays protein, rather than DNA, variation. Our results are consistent with that prior investigation. The presence of variation in the number of long (62 bp) repeats suggests that a simple PCR system could be designed to assay genetic diversity of populations in the species, using electrophoresis of PCR products, without the necessity for sequencing.

Phylogeny and Genetic Divergence

Our estimate of the phylogenetic relationships among those cephalopods whose complete mitogenomes are known (fig. 5) is largely concordant with prior results (e.g., Akasaki et al., 2006; Nishiguchi and Mapes, 2008; Allcock et al., 2011; Kawashima et al., 2013). Each of the ordinal-level taxa was monophyletic with moderate to high bootstrap support, and Allonautilus and Nautilus were united with 100% support. There was also support for some supraordinal relationships: Sepiida, Sepiolida, and Teuthida were united with 92% support; these comprise the traditional superorder Decapodiformes. The placement of Vampyromorphida as the sister taxon to the Octopoda was 79%; these two represent the traditional Octopodiformes. This latter relationship has been difficult to resolve in some prior molecular studies (e.g., Stöger and Schrödl, 2013). There was 100% support for the reciprocal monophyly of Coleoidea and Nautiloidea.

As is apparent from the phylogram shown in figure 5, there was less evolutionary divergence between Allonautilus and Nautilus than there was among species within the genus Sepia or species in the genus Octopus. In particular, for the relatively easily aligned COX and ATPase loci, the divergence between Allonautilus and Nautilus was 10.5%. Among three species of Octopus, divergences ranged between 14.2% and 16.1%; among 7 species of Sepia, divergences ranged between 11.4% and 18.8%. The only comparison in our study showing less divergence was that between the two species of Sepiella, 6.1%. Consequently, there was less divergence between the two genera of nautilids than between all but one pair of congeners in our survey, and all other intergeneric comparisons exceeded the nautilid divergence. Thus, the morphological divergence between the genera (fig. 1) is not accompanied by substantial mitochondrial differentiation, as previously noted by Woodruff et al. (1987) and Wray et al. (1995). If genetic divergence scales approximately linearly with time, then the divergence between several important coleid genera predates the divergence between the two nautilid genera. Nuclear DNA sequences may provide an additional perspective on the consequent taxonomic issue.

ACKNOWLEDGMENTS

This research would not have been possible without the 1984 and 1985 fieldwork by W.B. Saunders, L.E. Davis, P.D. Ward, and R.L. Knight in Papua New Guinea: we are grateful to these colleagues. We also thank Steve Thurston for preparing figure 1, Jonas Lai and Bill Mauck for assistance with some of the lab work, two anonymous reviewers for helpful comments on the manuscript, and Susan Perkins for organizational assistance with the REU program. This research was supported in part by an NSF Research Experience for Undergraduates grant (DBI 0850543), Mark Siddall and Susan Perkins, principal and coprincipal investigators. Additional support was provided by the Sackler Institute for Comparative Genomics, the Ambrose Monell Laboratory, and the Cullman Program for Molecular Systematics.

REFERENCES

Akasaki, T., et al. 2006. Extensive mitochondrial gene arrangements in coleoid Cephalopoda and their phylogenetic implications. Molecular Phylogenetics and Evolution 38: 648–658.

Allcock, A.L., I.R. Cooke, and J.M. Strugnell. 2011. What can the mitochondrial genome reveal about higher-level phylogeny of the molluscan class Cephalopoda. Zoological Journal of the Linnean Society 161: 573–586.

Barord, G.J., et al. 2014. Comparative population assessments of Nautilus sp. in the Philippines, Australia, Fiji, and American Samoa using baited remote underwater video systems. Plos One 9 (6): e100799. [doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0100799]

Bernt, M., et al. 2013. MITOS: Improved de novo metazoan mitochondrial genome annotation. Molecular Phylogenetics and Evolution 69: 313–319.

Bonacum, J., et al. 2011. Evolutionary radiation of present-day Nautilus and Allonautilus. American Malacological Bulletin 29: 1–16.

Bonnaud, L., C. Ozouf-Costaz, and R. Boucher-Rodoni. 2004. A molecular and karyological approach to the taxonomy of Nautilus. Comptes Rendus Biologies 327: 133–138.

Boore, J.L. 2006. The complete sequence of the mitochondrial genome of Nautilus macromphalus (Mollusca: Cephalopoda). BMC Genomics 7: 182.

Boore, J.L., J.R. Macey, and M. Medina. 2005. Sequencing and comparing whole mitochondrial genomes of animals. Methods in Enzymology 395: 311–348.

Conrad, T.A. 1847. Notes on shells, with descriptions of new genera and species. Journal of the Academy of Natural Sciences Philadelphia, Second Series 1: 210–214.

Dunstan, A., C.J.A. Bradshaw, and J. Marshall. 2011. Nautilus at risk-estimating population size and demography of Nautilus pompilius. Plos One 6 (2): e16716. [doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0016716]

Harvey, A.W., R. Mooi, and T.M. Gosliner. 1999. Phylogenetic taxonomy and the status of Allonautilus Ward and Saunders, 1997. Journal of Paleontology 73 (6): 1214–1217.

House, M.R. 1987. Geographic distribution of Nautilus shells. In W.B. Saunders and N.H. Landman (editors), Nautilus: the biology and paleobiology of a living fossil: 53–64. New York: Plenum Press.

Kawashima, Y., et al. 2013. The complete mitochondrial genomes of deep-sea squid (Bathyteuthis abyssicola), bob-tail squid (Semirossia patagonica) and four giant cuttlefish (Sepia apama, S. latimanus, S. lycidas, and S. pharaonis), and their application to the phylogenetic analysis of Decapodiformes. Molecular Phylogenetics and Evolution 69: 980–993.

Kimura, M. 1983. The neutral theory of molecular evolution. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

[Lightfoot, J.] 1786. A catalogue of the Portland Museum, lately the property of the Duchess Dowager of Portland, deceased. [London: Skinner], 194 pp.

Nei, M. 1987. Molecular evolutionary genetics. New York: Columbia University Press.

Nishiguchi, M.K., and R.H. Mapes. 2008. Cephalopoda. In W.F. Ponder and D.R. Lindberg (editors), Phylogeny and evolution of the Mollusca: 163–199. Berkeley: University of California Press.

Rehder, H.A. 1968. Valid zoological names of the Portland catalogue. Proceedings of the U.S. National Museum 121: 1–51.

Saunders, W.B. 1987. The species of Nautilus. In W.B. Saunders and N.H. Landman (editors), Nautilus: the biology and paleobiology of a living fossil: 35–52. New York: Plenum Press.

Saunders, W.B., and P.D. Ward. 1987. Ecology, distribution, and population characteristics of Nautilus. In W.B. Saunders and N.H. Landman (editors), Nautilus: the biology and paleobiology of a living fossil: 137–162. New York: Plenum Press.

Saunders, W.B., L.E. Davis, and R.L. Knight. 1987. Sympatric species of Nautilus (N. pompilius and N. scrobiculatus) in the Admiralty Islands, Papua New Guinea. Nautilus 101: 93–99.

Sinclair, W., S.J. Newman, G.S. Vianna, S. Williams, and W.J. Aspden. 2011. Spatial subdivision and generic diversity in populations on the east and west coasts of Australia: the multi-faceted case of Nautilus pompilius (Mollusca, Cephalopoda). Reviews in Fisheries Science 19 (1): 52–61.

Stöger, I., and M. Schrödl. 2013. Mitogenomics does not resolve deep molluscan relationships (yet?). Molecular Phylogenetics and Evolution 69: 376–392.

Swofford, D.L. 2001. PAUP*: phylogenetic analysis using parsimony (and other methods), version 4.0b.10. Sunderland, MA: Sinauer Associates.

Teichert, C., and T. Matsumoto. 1987. The ancestry of the genus Nautilus. In W.B. Saunders and N.H. Landman (editors), Nautilus: the biology and paleobiology of a living fossil: 25–32. New York: Plenum Press.

Ward, P.D. 1999. Phylogenetic taxonomy and the status of Allonautilus Ward and Saunders, 1997: Reply. Journal of Paleontology 73: 1217.

Ward, P.D., and W.B. Saunders, 1997. Allonautilus: a new genus of living nautiloid cephalopod and its bearing on phylogeny of the Nautilida. Journal of Paleontology 71 (6): 1054–1064.

Woodruff, D.S., M.P. Carpenter, W.B. Saunders, and P.D. Ward. 1987. Genetic variation and phylogeny in Nautilus. In W.B. Saunders and N.H. Landman (editors), Nautilus: the biology and paleobiology of a living fossil: 65–83. New York: Plenum Press.

Wray, C.G., N.H. Landman, W.B. Saunders, and J. Bonacum. 1995. Genetic divergence and geographic diversification in Nautilus. Paleobiology 21: 220–228.

[1]Division of Vertebrate Zoology (Ornithology), American Museum of Natural History.

[2]Divisions of Paleontology and Vertebrate Zoology (Ornithology), American Museum of Natural History. Current address: Department of Ecology and Evolution, Stanford University.

[3]Division of Paleontology, American Museum of Natural History.

[4]Division of Vertebrate Zoology (Ornithology), American Museum of Natural History.

[5]Rehder (1968) stated that the author of the species is Lightfoot, who prepared the catalog in which the original description of the species appeared. Because the catalog was published anonymously Lightfoot’s name is put in brackets.